Shasta County District Atty - Redding, California

MR. M.

This Shasta D.A. and Redding Police Department can not be trusted , they are" Policing for Profit".

The Supreme Court Just Struck a Huge, Unanimous Blow Against " Policing for Profit"
The Supreme Court struck an extraordinary blow for criminal justice reform on Wednesday, (ruling it to be Unconstitutional) placing real limitations on policing for profit across the country. Its unanimous decision for the first time prohibits all 50 states from imposing excessive fines, including the seizure of property, on people accused or convicted of a crime. Rarely does the court hand down a ruling of such constitutional magnitude—and seldom do all nine justices agree to restrict the power that police and prosecutors exert over individuals. The landmark decision represents a broad agreement on the Supreme Court that law enforcement’s legalized theft has gone too far.
Brady List.
a District Attorney (DA) or Police Department is on the "Brady list," it means that they have a record of officers or prosecutors with a history of dishonesty, misconduct, or credibility issues, which requires them to disclose this information to the defense in a criminal case if any of these individuals are involved in the investigation or prosecution, due to a legal precedent set by the Supreme Court case "Brady v. Maryland.
The term "Brady" comes from the landmark Supreme Court case "Brady v. Maryland," which established the legal requirement that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence (evidence that could help the defendant) to the defense, including information that could impeach the credibility of a witness like a police officer.
Who can be on the list:
Police officers, prosecutors, and other law enforcement personnel can be placed on the Brady list if they have a history of lying under oath, fabricating evidence, excessive force, or other serious misconduct that could affect their credibility as a witness.
Why it's important:
When a prosecutor is aware that an officer is on the Brady list, they must inform the defense attorney if that officer is involved in a case, allowing the defense to challenge the officer's testimony based on their past misconduct.
International Association of Chiefs of Police
All involved in corruption
1. Police Chief Brady Cops
2.Rpd "Brady Cops "
3."Brady listed" D.A. and Assistant D.A.'s
All of whom are intentionally keeping their records from the public which is a violation of Brady v. Maryland Doctrine, and the Public Records Request Act.
Court Staff/Witness-Whistleblower -Sworn Statement of the DA involvement in abusing her power in a Pattern of "Political Interference" in criminal court cases, to secure wrongful convictions , "Policing for Profit" while politically covering up Redding Dirty Cops conduct. And to Protect the Image Of Shasta from public scrutiny. Protests , Police reforms, Internal Investigations.
Witness Name redacted due to fear of retaliation by DA and " RPD Brady Cops"
Witness name redacted due to safety.
Why the DA does not want the Government involved, and transparency?
-how many innocent people have she falsely imprisoned for crimes they didn't commit?
California enacted a Law making it a Felony For Prosecutorial Misconduct.

New California law signed by Gov makes it a felony for prosecutors to intentionally withhold, alter, or destroy evidence that is favorable to the defendant in a criminal case. This law is codified under California Penal Code Section 141(c).

I highly suggest reforms , and transparency ,
If anyone has been wrongfully charged with a crime they didn't commit , go directly to the "Brady list "website , type in Shasta DA Brady list, for police Type in Redding Police Department Brady list , the whole list of the amount of bad cops they hired is disgusting , and it's a safety risk for citizens in our community to have bad cops doing more harm than they are doing good .including the chief who is on that list too and file a complaint. That goes down the DA and Redding Police . They need to be exposed.
Accountability

Daniel S.

Was here to get property released. They were helpful and polite. Then when I needed a letter from DA stating that the property they released could be obtained. They ghosted me for 3 weeks, no response. I came back for the 5 th time. And the staff told me stories that didn’t make sense. They then continued to state that they don’t do anything about that. When they had already had a typed out letter stating the property was to be released as the court ordered. Which was close to what I was asking for. But not good enough to get the property back. 🤬

John B.

Judge Buzard was very fair. I feel he's a pretty honest guy I would like to think we need to have more judges like him. He was very informative on the proceeding. Offered four different decisions and the fourth one was the best. I suggest you take that if offered it would be the deferral

Heather M.

I always had respect for law enforcement and our justice system after dealing with Shasta county District Attorneys Office and the run around they gave me, I have no faith in their integrity. They do Biased policing they pursue cases that fail as a matter of law. They threaten witnesses of penalties and charges if they don’t want to be their witness because the DA failed to provide them with protection as promised. Their bullying tactics in my opinion along with the biased policing has given me a perfect example for abuse of power. It would be nice if they held themselves to the standards that they hold Shasta County residents to.

Brad C.

A drug addict hit my son in the face with a stick wrapped in wire with enough force to break the sick in half. Kevin was assigned to us as the victim's advocate from the Victims Assistance Service. He was very supportive and kept us informed with every step of the process.

John W.

Pure garbage starting with Stephanie Bridgett all the way down to the bottom. Extremely corrupt and shady. There needs to be an option for negative stars!!! The whole entire county sucks!

Bm B.

Poor response. My diabled son was killed in his wheelchair by a hit/run. The prosecutor was sketchy with communication. I had said I WANTED TO BE PRESENT AT SENTENCING to have closure and approve any deals. The killer was sentenced without telling me until after the fact. I had no clue what the deal made was. I was left in Indiana with no recourse to confront the killer and have closure. Leaving me with an unhealed raw emotional wound. Not a word of apology from prosecutor. My wish is for them to have an opportunity to suffer the emotional pain they have inflicted on me. Having a child killed and left with no closure is absolutely obscene. Shame on Shasta prosecutors. Shame. Shame. Shame.

Robert T.

My friend told me about when she went down there to report her service dog being adopted out, while she was going through LSNC.
There she complained about the fact that she had talked to her representative about the facts, and asked her to approach this as though her representative was a Legal Professional, that knew what she was doing; and not to "ask them to give her her service dog back, because this was a violation..."
Overall this didn't happen. Whichever caused the loss of her service dog!
There after when she remembered in Court, that the DA would pick up cases where the charges were dropped; she thought this was a good idea!

They told her it was a Civil Matter...
THIS HAPPENS ALOT HERE!
To which case, it was done last night, by the RPD. When the manager took her keys, she was told to leave...
Dispatch on her second call, with a repeted call back, to get this same results! She is disabled and dying of Cancer. Can bearly walk, and like so many others; has no services at the Mission!

My friend has contacted about every place possible for help. And learned that therein are a few places to which should help! Without anyone to which responded! There she also returned to the DAs Office, spent what she said, about 45 minutes talking to the receptionist, to which her response was.
I DON'T THINK WE HANDLE THAT KIND OF THING!"
My friend replied. Yes you do! She had proof of this from the news to which shows that they do!

And still received nothing!